Sunday 11 December 2011

Trench Duty

Trench Duty, by Siegfried Sassoon, makes reference to the task the soldiers had to do in this part of the battlefield. This is done to highlight what the poems main theme is, which helps to make the poem stand stronger by itself.

Trench Duty is uses fourteen lines, each with ten syllables. The rhyme pattern is also very simple and clear, following the AABB type for the first eight verses, the ABAB type for the next four and a rhymed couplet for the two last verses as a manner of conclusion. Obviously, this is the formula for a sonnet. The use of a sonnet helps to make the poem feel more personal, as if it is being told from one person to another. 

This is also seen in the use of the first person to tell the poem. We see the use of 'I' through the stanzas, which again helps the poem feel as if it is being told orally from one man in the trenches to another.

In Trench Duty, we see many uses of war diction. Words such as trench, watch, bombardment and raid appear throughout, which solidifies the feeling of war-time in the mind of the reader. We also see diction related to fear and brutality, through words such as 'shaken', 'numbed' and 'horror'. These two styles of diction are used to convey the message of how terrible war is, and how mis-portrayed it is by the government. 


One strong moment in the passage is when Sassoon uses the line, " “Five minutes ago I heard sniper fire: Why did he do it? …Starlight overhead – Blank stars. I’m wide-awake; and some chap’s dead.” I believe that this line, while showing absurdity, is Sassoon's method of coping with what he has seen throughout the war. Not only does he mention the terror that he is feeling in the passage, but he also uses a style of ironic humour to try and pass it off as un-important. This is a well-known coping mechanism in humans, but could also be a use of juxta-position, as the humour shows a stark-contrast to the horrible diction used in the rest of the poem, and therefore highlights it even more.


Monday 5 December 2011

Blog Portfolio

Coverage:

Commentary Outline on Route March

Why I Chose This Passage From Chapter 3


Interesting Passage In The Sun Also Rises

Minder Mike

Bulls and Steers

Top Ten Reason To Be Bill

Bough of Nonsense Analysis

Repression of War Experience

Analysis of Greater Love


Before The Mirror and Greater Love Comparsion

Dulce Et Decorum Est and Anthem For Doomed Youth Comparsion

Robert Graves and Escape

Trench Duty

Depth:

Bulls and Steers

I chose this article as my depth blog, because I look a little bit more into what made Hemingway tick, and why he used  Bulls and Steers was a major motif in The Sun Also Rises, and also helped me to lean what motivated him in some of the themes of the stories as well, and his personality too!

Interaction:

 Before The Mirror and Greater Love Comparsion

I chose this post because it shows some disagreement between what I think, and what Georgia Nelson thinks about the comparison between Greater Love and Behind The Mirror.

Xeno-Blogging:

Trench Duty

I chose this blog post, from Wesley's blog, because it demonstrates an interesting discussion that we had over the humour of Sassoon.

Discussion:

Robert Graves and Escape

I chose this blog post because it shows a discussion between two of my classmates and myself.

Wild Card:

Gizmodo Girls Hates On Geek Kind

In this wild card, I talk about the relatively recent attack on Jon Finkle, a world-champion Magic: The Gathering player, as a cause for sensationalist journalism.


Thursday 1 December 2011

Gizmodo Girl Hates On Geek Kind

On August 29th, an article released by Gizmodo, a technology blog and opinion site, was written about using OKCupid, a very popular dating website that links people together based on common interests, and how the articles author's experience using the site went. Now, this all sounds fine and dandy so far, why should I care about how somebody's dating experience goes? Frankly, I don't. Usually. However, this article struck a cord. The author of the article,  states that, 'I'm single, I'm busy, and everybody's doing it.' Sure, why not log into a dating website? It might just work out. She then goes on to explain how she was receiving scary posts from people saying lewd things. Again, expected from some of the more shady denizens of the Internet. However, she explains that she got an instant message from a nice sounding guy, and decided to meet up with him. She explains how they had a fairly non-romantic evening, but towards the end of the night, the bomb dropped. She found out that he was the world-champion at Magic: The Gathering. For those of you that don't know, Magic: The Gathering is the worlds first, and most popular, trading card game. Large amounts of people, myself included, purchase cards to play against others in tournaments. She explains how at dinner on the next date, she asked him three questions. These three questions which would determine whether she saw him again she would see him again. There conversation went as follows:
"Did you still play? "Yes." Strike one. How often? "I'm preparing for a tournament this weekend." Strike two. Who did he hang out with? "I've met all my best friends through Magic." Strike three."
Yes. She broke up with him because of these three three response. She refused to understand that he was a nice guy, with a great personality, talent at something, and large amount of money, but she broke up on him because he played a card game. Magic: The Gathering has a large amount of anger towards it because people believe that it is a waste of time, and a waste of money. Some people that I've played with personally have spent up to $20,000 on their decks, which when you think about it, isn't much more than the average person spends on his car hobby, his season tickets to sports games, or other such hobbies.This shameful attack on the poor man even caused famous podcaster and blogger, Veronica Belmont, to tweet:

"I guess attempting to publicly shame a pretty awesome-sounding guy now constitutes tech journalism."
This shows how shallow and mean the writer was. She simply used the article for sensationalist journalism, which is something that Gizmodo are well known for. They have used hard-hitting articles that cause uproars to simply gain hits on their sites. Once again, shameless.

What strikes a cord is that as a geek myself, I've experienced this discrimination personally. I've noticed people judge me because I play World of Warcraft, another massive online game or Dungeons and Dragons, a group role-playing game. And it hurts. Jon Finkel, the world-champion Magic player who was attacked in this article, and everyone of us that is proud of our geek heritage shouldn't have to put up with this. 

 

Tuesday 22 November 2011

Robert Graves and Escape

In Escape, we see Robert Graves's true feelings come to light. We see an AABB rhyming scheme, which helps us to understand the feelings that Graves is trying to show in the poem. It shows that he is trying to make the poem a little bit more readable, and flow more off the tongue, to contrast the terrifying imagery of the poem itself.


This terrifying imagery is added to through the use of mythological diction, including terms such as "Lady Proserphine' and 'Cerberus'. These are terms that typically are found in Greek mythology and relate to the realm of Hades, the god of Death. This shows what the main theme of the poem is, and also what the main idea of the poem is. The main theme is that of the ever-presence of death, and the main idea is that Graves is escaping death's grip on him.

Along with the blatant religious metaphor, we see some allusion to Grave's real life after his injury. We see what was going on in his mind when he was injured in the war. He believed that he was going to die, and this poem chronicles what he believes he saw in that time, although in a probably fictionalised manner. We see mention of Graves thinking that Cerberus is an enemy, and that he tries to shoot him. W then also see the use of the "all-powerful poppy", which is a relation to morphine, a powerful painkiller. The sentence where Graves references the morphine seems to bring the poem back to reality, if only for an instant, which helps the poem to carry more weight.

What also adds to this weight is the first two lines of the poem, which mentions the actual death of Graves. These first two lines make it seem as if Graves is writing from beyond the grave, and that again adds a layer of terror and weight to the poem. Overall, it seems as if this is the whole point of the poem. Graves is showing how terrifying it is to believe that you are dying, and shows this to us in a way that seems very real and poignant. This is done to warn that war is not all fun and games, and that it can utterly terrify you and leave you scared beyond all imagination.

Sunday 20 November 2011

Comparison of 'Dulce et Decorum est' and 'Anthem for Doomed Youth'

Wilfred Owen's, "Anthem for a Doomed Youth" and "Dulce and Decorum Est" both convey a message of disgust about the horror of war through the use of painfully direct language and intense vocabulary. The reader can appreciate at the end of both of Owen's poems the irony between the truth of what happens at war and the lie that was being told to the people at home.
Wilfred Owen's, "Anthem for a Doomed Youth" and "Dulce and Decorum Est"
both convey a message of disgust about the horror of war through the use of painfully
direct language and intense vocabulary. The reader can appreciate at the end of both of
Owen's poems the irony between the truth of what happens at war and the lie that was
being told to the people at home. Although the tones of the two poems are slightly different, the common theme of brutality and devastation at war is unmistakable, and
through each poem Owen creates a lasting and disturbing impression on his reader.
In contrast to the spiritual and religious images of "Anthem", the tone of "Dulce
and Decorum Est" is significantly more violent and gruesome. Although Owen's
objective is once again to denounce and condemn the devastation and senselessness of
war in a world that believed it was a romantic occupation, he does this in a much more
powerful way through this poem. Owen does
not write about a glorified version of the life of a soldier, but rather paints a realistic view
of the sorrow, violence and devastation faced by these soldiers. Throughout this poem
the reader senses the agony and pain that these soldiers experienced and the horrible
tragedies that they encountered.
In spite of the differences with regard to tone in each of these poems, it is clear to
the reader that Owen's objective in each poem was to illustrate the terrible actuality of
war through vivid imagery. Owen himself was a soldier during World War
I and experienced first-hand the intensity and ruthlessness of war and he believed it was
his duty through poetry to denounce the war for what it really was- a festering evil of
which no good could come. In each of these poems, Owen conveys a message of disgust
about the horror of war to an ill-informed audience of smug Englishmen. Many people
believed it was sweet and fitting to die for one's country, but Owen suggests that this was
a lie. Through the vivid imagery and intense language used in each of these poems Owen
condemns the devastation of war and proves that the innocence of boyhood is lost in the
chaos and tragedy of war.

Thursday 17 November 2011

Before the Mirror and Greater Love Comparison

In both of these poems, we see the discussion of grief and loss. On one hand, Greater Love talks about the loss of soldiers and brothers-in-arms, but in Before The Mirror, we see one man grieving about the loss of his sister. Both of these are very poignant forms of grief, but they are shown in very similar ways.

The first stanza of Greater Love mirrors the first stanza of Before The Mirror, in that it talks about how an object is not as colourful as it would normally be. Before the Mirror takes a darker, more mournful tone about it, which is shown through majorly dark and tense diction, including words such as 'grief' and 'fright'. There is also a lot of cold diction, which I believe relates to the emotions of the speaker in Before The Mirror, which seems to be about a man who has lost his sister. This is again shown through the use of words such as 'wind, weary and snow', which helps to create the image of a bleak winter, which is typically the season of mourning.

This once again contrasts Greater Love, which glorifies the deaths of the soldiers, and makes it seem as if they died doing what they felt was right. The soldiers are shown as 'fierce', and 'pure', which are honorifics that typically make somebody seem as if they are heroes. Greater Love shows death in a completely different light than Before The Mirror. Greater Love glorifies it, while Before The Mirror mourns it.

One difference is that there is two completely different reasons for the deaths, which might also lead to the differences in emotions towards the fallen. In Before The Mirror, the death seems to be natural, and the speaker is shown as being completely distraught, while in Greater Love, the deaths are in battle, which seems to help glorify the deaths and make the soldiers seem that much more heroic.

The language used to describe death itself in the poems in rather similar as well, and you can sense that Owen took some inspiration from Swinburne. For example, both poems use words such as 'forbidden' and 'harsh', to show the affects of death on love, which shows the feelings that both poems have towards the subject.

My classmate Georgia mentions that Greater Love is a mockery of Before The Mirror, which I completly disagree with. I believe that Greater Love is a hommage to Before The Mirror, and that Owen is expressing his love for that poem in parodying it in this. Owen supposedly had a great love of poetry, and so it is easy to understand why he would reference a favourite poem in his, as mimicry is the ultimate form of flattery.

One final thing about the poems is the themes. In Before The Mirror, we see one mans reflections on the death of one person very important to him. He mourns that one person and feels awful about how it is affecting him. This is mirrored in Greater Love, on a macro scale. In Greater Love, Owen is commenting on the massive scale of love that is talked about in Greater Love, which mentions that generality of love felt for soldiers by the people fighting at home. This talks about the almost nationalistic feeling of pride that people have towards the men fighting for their countries.

Monday 14 November 2011

Analysis of Wilfred Owen's Greater Love

Greater Love is a poem in which Wilfred Owen expresses his admiration for brotherly love. Soldiers' love is repeatedly glorified with honorifc words like "fierce","pure", "exquitsite" who evidently suffered and sacrificed their lives for their countrymen. Yet, Owen criticisizes the countrymen for their disability to understand this kind of sacrificial love and "touch them not". Due to their lack of experience and exposure, society will never understand by just knowing and reading about soldiers' love.

The soldiers' love is seen to be "greater" than erotic love. The soldiers' love, in fact, is compared to Christ's agape love for sinners. similarly, soldiers sacrificed their lives for ignorant society. Hence, compared to erotic love, brotherly love suffered more killings and injuries like "knife-skewed" and "stained stones". Yet, the conflict and sacrifices faced by soldiers made their love more "greater" in beauty and more real. even erotic love "seems shame to their love pure". Ironically, even if erotic love is more gentle and "dear", violence, fighting and killing invited by soldiers' love - still raised Owen's qualification of this love as "greater". Irony is that violence could be the strong bond of sufferings shared by soldiers and thus, made this love "greater".
Since brotherly love carries violence, their love is seen to be ugly and gruelsome. yet, despite the overwhelming beauty and exquisitness of erotic love, brotherly love is honored by Owen as more "greater". this is because erotic love only brings pleasure and hopes for return but brotherly love sacrificed their lives without question for countrymen. worse still, for people who are ignorant.
There are several comparison made by Owen between erotic love and brotherly love. the differences which set these two kinds of love apart is attraction/lure (Verse 1), physical connection (Verse 2), sounds (Verse 3), and sincerity, which (Verse 4)  compares and contrast to bring forth the question of the permanance and sincerity of erotic love. to emphasize that, Owen introduces eortic love as weak and temporary with feminine words, in contrast to brotherly love which is portrayed as strong ad everlasting with masculine words.

Lastly, despite soldiers' love being more "greater" and beautiful, Owen criticises society for not being to understand. Society not only do not care, they failed to experience and be exposed to the same sufferings of war which formed the agape love of soldiers for their countrymen, for their comrades and for their country. Owen brings readers to understand that even if they were to read the poem and know about the sacrificial love of soldiers, they'll not truly understand. it is not sufficient to just know about their plight but also to experience and share their sufferings to truly understand. in addition, by saying so, Owen reveals that brotherly love is so great that it couldn't be truly expressed in just printed words.

Thursday 10 November 2011

Repression of War Experience

The poem has no apparent rhythm or rhyme scheme, or any regularity of the stanzas - it appears to be an invective of thoughts which build up to madness, even admitting this at the endof the poem, in which you can see glimpses of conflict between his own feelings about the war and the propaganda that was pumped into recruits at the time that sends him into a kind of frenzy. The structure perhaps reflects the way in which some soldiers were driven to madness through these conflicts - their own attitudes of indignation at the injustice and complete insanity of war crushed and squashed  by the general consensus that 'war is glorious' and 'you're not a man if you don't fight', a way of thinking that Sassoon was well known for having.

  Sassoon portrays the insanity of war in a variety of ways. One technique is through analogy - the moths are described as 'silly beggars' to 'scorch their wings with glory, liquid flame', a distinct parallel to soldiers who are attracted to the fame and glory of war, only to be 'scorched' when it's too late. The war was hyped up to be a big glorious parade, but the very image of glory is shattered as soon as the soldiers realise what war really is: a tragic, futile bloodbath which they have no means to escape.


As we proceed further through the poem we see Sassoon after the war in his home And he can't even enjoy the 'jolly company' of books, he can't ever escape from the horror of the war experience even through literature. The madness seems to return again through the way Sassoon describes the books - 'dressed in dim black, and black, and white, and green/and every kind of colour. Which will you read?' It's almost as if he's talking to his inner child, the child that was so pure before war corrupted it...and now he can never enjoy the carefree pleasure of a book. He can only 'sit and gnaw your nails', again, the war experience never leaving him, the constant nervousness and terror even when he's at home, 'summering safe'. Every little thing reminds him of the war, the moth again, the garden where he believes the ghosts are. Sassoon seems to feel some sort of resentment towards the people who died in the war. The ghosts he describes didn't have the luxury of a quick bullet to the head, instead, like him, they had to suffer 'slow, natural deaths'. It is almost as if Sassoon wishes he had died in war, rather than carrying the burden of an 'ugly soul' - the fact that he had committed so many 'nasty sins' throughout the war and seen so much suffering remains with him as he continues to live his life. Although it's not really much of a life, his life right now is really a 'slow natural death' as he can't live properly anymore. He can't take any pleasure in life, he seems to be merely dying slowly as the days go by.

And in the last stanza of the poem there is still the echo of the guns in his mind, 'they never cease'. He can still hear them many years after, tormenting him so much to the extent that he 'wants to go out/And screech at them to stop'. The final sibilance of 'stark, staring mad' really shows the extent to which this soldier has been pushed - he will never be the same man again as the horror of war continues to vex him.

Tuesday 8 November 2011

Bough of Nonsense Analysis.

To understand this rather confusing poem, I first had to figure out what style of poem it was written in the style of an idyll, which typically describes rustic life, in the style of the Idylls by Theocritus.
According to the research that I did, Theocritus describes initmate scenes from everyday life.

Upon finding this out, I could understand the poem a little more. It doesn't talk about actual war, but the results of it. They discuss how the war affected them. Only one of the characters is named, Robert, the other is un-named, and simply called S. The poem is written using their dialogue, and can be interpretted as a dialogue between Robert and another friend of his, possibly Sassoon, based on the way he talks and the letter his character starts with.

The character, S, mentions that he has lived three thousand years, and that he is now nine-parts dead, which may be a hint at the massive amounts of people that died during the first World War. S seems to be the elder of the characters in the poem, and seems to carry the conversation, with Robert looking up to him. The character do confuse me, however, as the language they use is very fantastical and their language at certain points seems to be coming from the same character perspective.

Finally, the poems theme seems to be that war is totally nonsense, which is portrayed through the nonsense that the character talk about. They stay away from mentioning anything to do with the war, and talk about things that don't have any place in the contemporary society. It reaches a new profoundness at the line 'we all worship nonsense', which I believe talks about the materialistic nature of societies. Once again, it is difficult to properly analyse the poem, due to the confusing nature of the language used, but it is an interesting poem.

Monday 7 November 2011

The Top 10 Reason for Being Bill

10. You fly solo
9. You can hold your liquor
8. You just don’t give a shit
7. You’re adventurous by nature
6. You’re a tough guy with a soft heart
5. You always have a snappy comeback
4. You don’t pull your punches
3. You show your true colors to true men
2. You have a razor sharp wit
1. Everybody likes you
 

Wednesday 2 November 2011

Bulls And Steers

A major theme of the Sun Also Rises is the constant reference of bulls and steers. These terms are used as a symbol of Jake and his group of friends. Throughout the novel, we see different references to the intertwining relationships of the group, and each persons character. We also see occasions of the group appearing to take charge of their current situations, and others where they simply take it.

To understand the use of bulls and steers, really we need to analyse what those two terms mean. Firstly, a bull is a creature of immense hello James i guess you didn't see this power, that is well known for its ability for causing carnage. An example of this is the famous idiom, "A bull in a china shop". Bulls are also known for being symbols of strength and being representative of mental strength. On the other hand, a steer is a bull that has been castrated, to prevent him from becoming aggressive, and to make him easily controllable.

In another essay that we read by Hemingway about bullfighting, it is shown that bulls and steers have very different personalities. The bulls are shown as being very aggressive towards the steers, and being very domineering over them as well. The steers are shown as taking the pain and damage, and letting the bulls treat them awfully. However, when the bulls and steers are together in a group, they are shown as pacifying the bulls.

From these examples, we can begin to see what some examples of bulls and steers are in the novel. If you look at Jake, he is constantly shown as being trampled over by the other members of his group. He is shown as not really caring what happens to him, which is a typical feature of the literal animal of a steer. His war wound also is a parallel to the castration of the steer.

An example of a bull in the novel is Mike. Mike is very aggressive, and prides himself on his masculinity and his power. He is constantly shown as being the leader or one of the co-leaders of the group. He is rather the epitome of a powerful man, although he is shown as having a weak personality, something that we grow to also expect from the ultra-masculine through the novel.

On the other hand, the bulls and steers can also be seen to show sexuality. That is why Cohn and Jake are shown as the major steers of the novel. Jake is castrated, which limits him sexually, and Cohn lets women dominate him, and allows them to get the better of him, which is something that Hemingway wouldn't have agreed with. One example of a bull is Brett, who is very dominant of the group, as she controls both Jake and Cohn, making them follow her around like pariahs.


Wednesday 19 October 2011

Minder Mike

Dear Embarrassed in Encion,

Thanks for writing to me, Embarrassed. I'd love to help you, but I don't think I can. You don't seem to understand what makes people get friends. People get friends by being loud, and showing off what they have. You're feeling ostracized because you arn't socializing like a normal person. People LOVE IT when you make lots of noise. Just the other day, I pulled this fantastic woman by showing her my thousands of medals, and yelling about the war. Trust me, it worked. In fact, I'm dating this fantastic woman right now, and she seems to LOVE it when I show what I won in the war. Just the other day she asked me to tell another war story. I didn't feel like it though, I've told them so many times, it gets boring for me to recite the exciting stories so often, to so many admiring people.

My advice to you is to stop being such a coward. Through those reservations out the window, and get making some noise. Women love noise, and bravado. Once again, trust me on this. You're cowardice is whats affecting your reputation. Nobody wants to spend time with you because you arn't exciting. Man up, my friend. You mentioned at the beginning of your letter that you are uncomfortable with their loud, rude behaviour in public. I know that I've been telling you to be loud as well, but you also need to take into account being assertive. Assertiveness is a tennant of manhood. If these people are making you feel oppressed, tell them so. Don't let anybody get you down, or take control of you. You have to take control, you have to tell them to get out of your face, and let you be your own man. You have to be assertive, and make them stop ruining your reputation. Reputation is what makes a man. I mean, I have hundreds of medals, and they obviously show me as a warhero. Without those medals, I would have less of a reputation, and therefore be less of a man. You have to keep that reputation, my friend.

I really hope that this advice helped you out,

Minder Mike

Monday 17 October 2011

Interesting passage from The Sun Also Rises

While reading Chapter 15 of the Sun Also Rises, I noticed an interesting item, there was a passage where a festival celebrating foreigners was very prominent. Jake's journalistic experience helps him to spot things that most people would pass of as not needed, or that would be passed over by a casual observer. On pages 158, and 159, we see a festival were workmen and women dressed in red celebrate the coming of foreigners to the town. At first, this seems rather innocent, but upon further analysis is a lot more political. 

Since 1923 up until 1978, Spain was a fascist country, and as such, was very anti-Communist. This passage is majorly led by Communist party members, who want to bring about change in their society, and are using the presence of foreigners in their town to help support that cause. This is evident from the line, 'Hooray for Wine! Hooray for the Foreigners!'. One important tenant of Fascism is nationalism, which means keeping the country to its natives. The Communist members of the festival are celebrating having foreigners around, as it means that the Fascist party is being defeated, even if on a small level. Bill and Jake are confused at first about who the foreigners, but soon realise that they ARE the foreigners that are being celebrated. This prompts them to go and find Brett and Mike, so that they can join in on the fun.

The communism symbolism is throughout the chapter. It mentions the peasants at the beginning sitting in wine stores, going out of its way to use peasants where it could have called the townsfolk, which highlights the working class more so than is necessary for the passage. This symbolism continues onto the next page, where it mentions men dressed in workmen's clothing, and wearing large red handkerchiefs, which lends itself to Communists dress, although subtly. This allusion continues through the chapter, with reference to soldiers being ridiculed, something that rebellious people would do, if only to stir up unrest or antagonism.

This whole parade is something that I would expect Jake to pick up upon, because of his interest in politics, and especially the feelings that him and Bill hold towards certain governments. Their joy at the Communist themed party is unsurprising, considering to their love of the working class, and their hatred for the more upper-class American government. It is surprising how Brett and Mike enjoy the party, especially considering Brett's status as a lady. I believe that this highlights her stupidity, and her shallowness, as she doesn't understand that the fiesta is communist themed.

Wednesday 12 October 2011

Why I chose this passage from Chapter 3



"You neither."
"It doesn't make any difference with me. It doesn't make any difference with a woman."
"What are you called?"
"Georgette. How are you called?"
"Jacob."
"That's a Flemmish name."
'American, too."
"You're not Flammand?"
"No, American."
"Good, I deteste Flammands."
By this time we were at the restaurant. I called to the cocher to stop. We got out and Georgette did not like the look of the place. "This is not great thing of a restaurant."
"No," I said. "Maybe you would rather go to Foyot's. Why don't you keep the cab and go on?"
I had picked her up because of a vague sentimental idea that it would be nice to eat with some one. It was a long time since I had dined with a poule, and I had forgotten how dull it could be. We went into the restaurant, passed Madame Lavigne at the desk, and into a little room. Georgette cheered up a little under the food.
"It isn't bad here," she said. "It isn't chic, but the food is all right."
"Better than you eat in Liege."
"Brussels, you mean."
We had another bottle of wine and Georgette made a joke. She smiled and showed all her bad teeth, and we touched glasses.
"You're not a bad type," she said. "Its a shame you're sick. We get on well. What's the matter with you, anyway?"
"I got hurt in the war," I said.
"Oh, that dirty war."
We would probably have gone on and discussed the war and agreed that is was in reality a calamity for civilisation, and perhaps would have been better avoided. I was bored enough.




I chose this passage, which is taken from pages 24 and 25 from The Sun Also Rises, because it delivers a variety of important facts to the reader. It provides large amounts of characterisation, as seen when Georgette insults the Flemmish, and also where Jake mentions about having a sentimental idea about eating with people. This line, in fact, gives us more insight into his character than the rest of the passage, as it lets us know how much his injury has hindered him, and how it has completely changed his life. This is an insight to the character that also helps to explain some of his motivations. One of these motivations, which we see in this passage, is his inviting a woman he meets off the street to eat dinner with him. This shows how he still tries and keeps some semblance of his life before the war, and that he wants to keep living.

Another reason that I chose this passage is because of its value in literary elements. The dialogue is short, and uses little description, and is used simply to get the point of what one character wants to say to the other. Jake doesn't say more than he needs to, even though  Georgette seems to want him to. He only says what he feels is necessary, once again giving us an insight into his character. He is a journalist, and therefore feels that there is no need to mince words. He feels that you just need to get the point across to the reader, or in this case, the listener. The final sentence of the passage gives us a great insight into the character of Jake. It shows us that he is cynical, something that really helps to explain some of his other points.

The casual racism from Georgette at the beginning of the novel not only ages the book, and gives us a point of view into the social climate of the time period, but it also gives us some characterisation of Georgette, the woman who we have only just met, and who we do not see again in the book. It seems strange  that Jake would report on somebody that he only sees once, but it again shows us something about him. He simply reports on what he sees, however insignificant, and states it matter-o-factually, which again harkens back to his training as a journalist. I believe that this passage shows us themes, motifs and important characterisations, and is therefore a very important passage from Book 1.


Monday 10 October 2011

Commentary Outline on Route March

Step 1 - Annotations

Step 2 - Context

This is a World War One poem, written by the poet during his time in the army, and based on his observations and experiences during the war. The author talks to a group of men, without them being there, which shows use of apostraphe.

Step 3 - Questions

Who?

The narrator is an unnamed person, probably a squad leader or the equivalent, who seems to have knowledge about death and war. The use of the second person in the poem shows us that the character is actually present in the setting, and that he is talking to a group of specific people, soldiers in this case. A group of soldiers, who are probably going to die are addressed in this poem, adding to the sombre mood of the poem, and also helping to propogate the message of the poem.


What?

The soldiers are being sent to the frontlines, a location that has negative conotations, and that is known for the massive amounts of deaths associated with it.

Where?

This poem takes place on a World War One battlefield, which both has a negative connotation, and adds to the dark diction of the poem.

How?

There is a perverse diction in this poem, as words such as 'rejoice' are used to deal with death. Death is shown in a very positive light, which is a perverse juxtaposition with the setting and actions of the poem.

Patterns?

There are many patterns in this poem, mainly to do with the mechanical elements of the poem. It uses an AA, BB, CC rhyming scheme, which gives it the idea of being like a nursery rhyme, once again adding the perversity of the poem. The word earth is used quite often, as are words like sleeping, which make death seem pleasant.

Tensions? This poem is clearly being used as propoganda. It makes death seem like nothing to be worried about, and praises men for marching off into the fight and dying. It makes death seem trite and easy, which removes some of the honour from the dead men. The poem is possibly used as satire against governments that willingly send their men off to die without worrying about them.

Step 4: So What?

Introduction:

Who? What? Where? and author and poem name

Body: How? Patterns?

Conclusion: Tenisions?

Step 5:

I will focus on structure, rhythm, imagery and diction.

Step 6:

Introduction: Author, poem title: Charles Sorley, Route March. Written in 1914.

Body:

Structure:

Rhythm is used to sound like marching soliders and drums.

Repetition isn't very prevalent. Indentation is used to give some semblance of repitition.

Rhyme is used to make the lines flow together, to add the idea of a solider's unit marching, and to make the poem flow of the tongue better.

Tonally, the poem starts off in a positive mood, but holds some sarcasm from the speaker. There is a juxtaposition between happiness and death, and what seems to be repetition of the 'so be' phrase. There is also a lot of reference to earth, which makes it seem a little more natural.









Friday 7 October 2011

Blog Portfolio for Quarter 1

Allusion in The Sun Also Rises

Throughout the Sun Also Rises, we see allusion to a variety of novelists. This helps to build immersion in the novel, and help us to relate the novel to the real-world. This is a common feature of novels, especially ones set in the real world, and is usually used to help the readers of the novel make connections between other works and the novel they are actually reading. This helps with backing up some the themes that are prevalent in the novel, and also helps to keep the novel in a contemporary setting.

In the beginning of the novel, we see an allusion to The Purple Lands, which is a novel about the futility of love, which is one of the novels most prevalant themes. The use of this book not only gives a second-dimension to the novel, by making the story feel as if it takes place in the real world, but it also makes the characters in the novel more interesting, as it helps the reader to make connections to the characters, as they understand the reasons behind characters referencing the books, making the characters themselves feel more real as well.

In Book 2 of the novel, we see quite a few references to famous people from the 1920's, which once again helps to build immersion into the story, as it feels like a more real setting. The first of these allusions that we see is in the reference to A.E.W Mason, where Jake mentions that he is reading a collection of short stories, most likely The Four Corners Of The World, which was published in 1917. Mason was an author and politician, who also served in the British army during World War One. He attained the rank of Major, and helped to set up counter-espionage in Spain and Mexico. Mason sounds like he would be somebody that Jake (and Hemmingway) admires, which again gives us more depth to the novel.

Another allusion is in the style of H.L. Menchken, where we see Bill and Jake quoting lines from one of his novels. Without extensive research, its difficult to tell what novel or play this quote is from, but it does tell us something about the relationship between the two men. They are able to quote lines from a play that they both love fluently, and do it in the complete comfort of their friendship. This shows that there is a love and friendship between Bill and Jake that goes back far, and bonds them also in a brotherly manner.

Basque is a reference to the area of Northern Spain where Jake and Bill holiday. He refers to the people from this area as Basques.

The reference to Ronceveux is again a reference to an area in Northern Spain. Jakes reference to it as grey metal while on the bus, and remembers that it was ambushed during World War One, which once again links Jake to his job as a soldier during World War 1.

The Fratellinis are a reference to three clowns who became very popular during the First World War. They were well known for ridiculing the war, and Bill's singing of Irony and Pity is a reference to both the Fratellinis ideals and their work in ridiculing the war.

Primo De Rivera was the spanish dictator between 1923 and 1930, who enforced strict nationalism. Bill references this while telling Jake to be "ironic" to the waitress.

Dred Scott was the name of an African-American slave. He was taken by his master, an officer in the U.S. Army, from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and then to the free territory of Wisconsin. He lived on free soil for a long period of time.Bill references this while talking to Jake about the Civil War, and when he tells Jake that Lincoln was gay. This exemplifies Bill's wacky ideas when he is drunk.

The Anti-Saloon league were the main group of people that lobbied for prohibition in the United States. Bill references them to Jake when he is telling him that he is drunk.

William Jennings Bryan was a politician who was well known for his "Cross of Gold" speech. Bill references him when talking about the "Monkey Trail", an idea that talked about the differences between evolution and creationism.

Bill's reference to the Holy Cross is his attempt at humour and irony, as The Holy Cross was a christian school in Massachusetts, but Bill was extremely critical of religion.

Frankie Fristch was a baseball player in New York, who Bill name drops while talking about who he went to school with.

Bishop Manning was a bishop in New York, who played a large role in World War One. Jake mentions him while talking about what public figures he was around while going to school in New York.

Wayne B. Wheeler was an attorney who advocated the prohibition, and is probably one of the people in the world that Bill and Jake didn't like very much.

President Calvin Coolridge was the 30th President of the United States, and would have been president during the time of the novel.




Wednesday 5 October 2011

Contrasting Characters

 My favourite part of The Sun Also Rises so far is the contrasting characters of Cohn and Jake. Throughout the first book, we see them interacting in very similar ways, although with different motivations or different desires. First of all, Cohn is a very physically fit man. He is very strong, very big, but seems to be emotionally damaged, due to his previous experiences with women. These experiences include being in serious relationships twice, and both times the women breaking his heart.

On the other hand, Jake is not a big man, and he is not physically fit. He is in fact impotent, something that he constantly dwells on, which means that he is also, in a way, damaged because of his inability to interact with women successfully. He is not as large as Cohn, or as strong, but he still manages to find some success in what he does.


These two characters are both very similar, and very contrasting. They both have problems with women, they both have varying degrees of literary success, and they both seem to love Lady Ashley.  Jake approaches this in a way that seems to be that of a platonic friend, and tries to spend time with her, and simply talk to her, but Cohn sees it as something a lot more visceral. He sees it as a love that he would attribute to somebody that he wants to marry.

Finally, they are similar in the ways that they feel about each other, however they display these in very different ways. Cohn is very open about his affection towards Jake, and even tells him at one point that he is his best friend. Jake is a little reluctant about admitting his feelings towards Cohn, and only expresses his friendship to Cohn in hidden ways. He rescinds comments that hurt Cohn's feelings, and feels bad for Cohn when Cohn says that Jake is his best friend. This shows that Jake does care about Cohn, just doesn't feel comfortable expressing these feelings, possibly because he is a very 'manly' man.


This contrast is something thats very prominent in fiction, and something that helps to build character. In one of favourite book series, The Legend of Drizzt, the main character is almost parallel to his arch-enemy, except for one fact. Drizzt is compassionate, and his enemy is not. This is not only helps to build character, but it also highlights one of the main reasons for conflict, in real life and in fiction. It highlights that similarities between people generally lead to conflicts. If you have two people that are very similar, chances are that between them they are going to end up starting a fight. Although that hasn't happened yet between Cohn and Jake, we see some definitite tension between them, which is mostly a cause of this.

One of my classmates, Sitara, disagrees with my theory, however. She believes that the relationship is completly one-sided, with Cohn showing un-recipricated love towards Jake. I understand what she is saying the piece, but I feel that she is wrong, as if Jake didn't like Cohn, why would he be taking back his insults? She makes an interesting point on Jake putting Cohn down because he feels insecure in his masculinity, which is understandable from Jake's point of view, but then every guy puts down his friends, just to get that little bit of an edge on them. You can read more on what she has to say on it here: http://sitaramathur.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/jake-barnes-vs-robert-cohn/



Monday 19 September 2011

Dead Island Review (Wildcard)

Dead Island Review

Dead Island is a zombie game. There's no way around that piece of information. And yes, that is going to get it some hate, simply because of the recent uprising in the zombie and vampire genres. Yes, there have been masses of zombie games recently, including the recent Dead Rising 2. However, unlike Dead Rising 2, Dead Island is an excellent game.  Its been a game that's held my attention for the gaming time I've had over the last week, and has been the game thats kept me awake the longest, and not only because its absolutley terrifying.
The gameplay itself  is amazing. Not only does it use a fantastic melee system, but it feels visceral and real. The role-playing skill tree feels slightly stilted, in that only one tree REALLY feels useful, and the quests seem a little strange, but in all, the gameplay itself is great. The zombies are well detailed, as some are fast, some slow and some special. These special zombies seem a little out of place, but they make the game seem more challenging, so I'm all for it. The weapons are fun and slightly wacky. For example, I currently hold an electrified fire-axe. Yes, it seems a little strange, but its awesome. It feels great and really does some damage to the zombie hordes, often in a very visceral way. The combat system, something that I usually get held up on in a melee game, is phenomenal. The fact that the game uses stamina when you swing your weapon makes you time your blows, and makes the combat actually seem dangerous. Upon connecting with the zombie foes, damage is done and numbers pop up, and the zombies bones crunch. Its very satisfying. Occasionally, you will see a big red "Break!" or "Cut!", which tells you that you have stopped the zombie from using a limb, which is generally good, as it stops them from hurting you too much. Its the closest I've seen gaming get to what I call the perfect melee system, but thats a post for another day.
However, the game does have some downsides. First of all, its butt-clenchingly terrifying. It really makes me sacred, and is actually the first game that I've been able to keep playing even though I'm really scared. Its rather captivating. Not really a downside, but I felt I had to warn everybody.Now, for the real downside.  The storyline is not fantastic. For the game that captured the world with its heart-wrenching trailer, the storyline was not great. It seems forced, and has almost nothing of the emotion that the trailer does. It feels somewhat dead and simply an action game. It has some sad parts, especially at the beginning, where you meet a character who had to kill his wife and brother. Apart from that, however, the emotion is very forced.
The weapon modification system feels like what Dead Rising should have been. You are able to combine items with weapons, and make wacky items. Currently, I have a baseball bat wrapped with barbedwire, a rag covered stick (which burns), and an electrified axe, which I mentioned earlier.
However, I played the game for the visceral and gory combat, and loved it to death (no pun intended). Its fun, scary and all around great. The storyline is silly, and some of the quests poorly written, and its still a little glitchy, but I highly recommend getting the game. Its a fantastic game. It gets an esteemed 8.5/10.
 

You can see me and Nick Nizzi playing the game at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXVZfEMzQPg


Rosalind and Orlando 0-141 Comicbook








RedIce555, Cool Bachelor, December 7 2008, Deviant Art, http://th05.deviantart.net/fs39/PRE/i/2008/342/e/d/Cool_Bachelor_by_RedIce555.jpg


 Valknot, The Sad, November 8 2004, Deviant Art, http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs5/i/2004/313/5/2/the_sad_by_Valknot.jpg


Emma-Pure-Angel, Young Blood, May 31, Deviant Art, http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/151/c/6/young_blood_by_emma_pure_angel-d3hp5e1.jpg


DizzyLizzles, Hyena, April 7 2008, Deviant Art, http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs27/f/2008/098/a/f/Hyena_by_DizzyLizzles.jpg


99DEEPBLACK, Three_Wise_Monkey, Januarry 30 2010, Deviant Art, http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/030/7/3/Three_Wise_Monkeys_by_99DEEPBLACK.png


OfTheDunes, Springtime Field, April 9 2009, Deviant Art, http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs44/i/2009/106/6/3/Springtime_Field_by_OfTheDunes.jpg


dickcheese, crying, Febuary 10 2006, Deviant Art, http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs9/i/2006/041/5/7/crying_by_dickcheese.jpg


iMiau, Immortal Clock, Febuary 13 2010, Deviant Art, http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/044/3/b/Immortal_Clock__by_iMiau.jpg 

julian-rassman, Storm, April 19, 2008, Deviant Art,  http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs29/f/2008/110/f/7/Storm_by_julian_rassmann.jpg





Monday 12 September 2011

Rosalind and Orlando (Act 4, Scene 1, lines 126-143)

Men are April when the woo:





















RedIce555, Cool Bachelor, December 7 2008, Deviant Art, http://th05.deviantart.net/fs39/PRE/i/2008/342/e/d/Cool_Bachelor_by_RedIce555.jpg

December when they wed:



 Valknot, The Sad, November 8 2004, Deviant Art, http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs5/i/2004/313/5/2/the_sad_by_Valknot.jpg

Maids are May when they are wed:

Emma-Pure-Angel, Young Blood, May 31, Deviant Art, http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/151/c/6/young_blood_by_emma_pure_angel-d3hp5e1.jpg

When you are disposed to be merry, I will laugh like a hyena:



DizzyLizzles, Hyena, April 7 2008, Deviant Art, http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs27/f/2008/098/a/f/Hyena_by_DizzyLizzles.jpg

Or else she could not have the wit to do this: the wiser, the waywarder:
99DEEPBLACK, Three_Wise_Monkey, Januarry 30 2010, Deviant Art, http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/030/7/3/Three_Wise_Monkeys_by_99DEEPBLACK.png
 Men are april when they woo:
 OfTheDunes, Springtime Field, April 9 2009, Deviant Art, http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs44/i/2009/106/6/3/Springtime_Field_by_OfTheDunes.jpg

December when they wed:
 AkiNeko, Snow December 2010 VII, December 20 2010, Deviant Art, http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/354/f/f/snow_december_2010_vii_by_akineko-d3590cq.jpg

I will weep for nothing:


dickcheese, crying, Febuary 10 2006, Deviant Art, http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs9/i/2006/041/5/7/crying_by_dickcheese.jpg

Picture of a mockingbird, to symbolize Rosalind's mocking of Orlando:



FrostyMorningBliss, MockingBird, Febuary 20, Deviant Art, http://th08.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/i/2011/058/e/4/mockingbird_by_frostymorningbliss-d39yb9o.jpg

Picture of an old clock to symbolize Forever and a day:



iMiau, Immortal Clock, Febuary 13 2010, Deviant Art, http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/044/3/b/Immortal_Clock__by_iMiau.jpg



Wednesday 7 September 2011

Jacques As An Antagonist

In the play As You Like It, by William Shakespeare, there is a high amount of antagonism. The most obvious instance of this is Oliver at the beginning of the play, when he is mistreating Orlando. Another instance is Duke Frederick, who exiled Rosalind from his house. This are very typical forms of antagonistic archetypes, with them being openly hateful. This is a form of antagonism that is commonly shown in films produced by Disney and Pixar, where the ideas of good and evil are very black and white. There is another form of antagonist, however, one that is shown in films such as the Bourne Ultimatum, where the lines between good and evil are blurred. The antagonists in these sorts of films are very gray, with their ideas being well intentioned and not just being evil for evils sack. This is the sort of antagonist that Jacques is. He is being antagonistic towards the other characters in the play simply to help them understand that the way they are thinking is wrong. Of course, this idea is something that you would imagine from a supervillian, who says that they intend to fix the world, but go about it in the wrong way. Villains such as Lex Luthor and Ras Al Ghul have good views such as this, but want to meet their goals through killing millions. While Jacques doesn't take it to that extent, he still makes his good intentions known through attacking the other characters points of view. He is very pretentious in his views, at one point making fun of the verse that Orlando has been writing on the trees. He says that he lacks wit, and shouldn't be ruining the trees with his poetry. Along with being insulting towards Orlando, Jacques is very covetous of Touchstones position, even going so far as to pitch his wit against him. However, Jacques seems to be lacking in wit, something that has made him even more angry with Touchstone. This lack of wit is shown in his famous speech, 'All The Worlds A Stage'. Doing research, it appears that this way of thinking was very well known before this speech was made, which possibly highlights that Jacques simply was re-purposing somebody else way of thought to further his own ends. Also, the fact that he is very proud of giving up his wealth and estate, as shown in Act 2 Scene 5, he takes to show that he is better than everybody, again highlighting how he believes he is vastly superior to all the other characters in the play. All of this factors show how Jacques is an antagonist, not only through action, but through his way of speaking as well. He is shown as being disliked and hurtful, and feeling very superior to the other characters, traits that are almost universally shared between antagonists in fiction.

Monday 5 September 2011

Book's Being Transfered To The Big Screen

Recently, I blogged about the differences between the written form of As You Like It, and the filmed version being performed at the Globe. The differences between the two forms shocked me, and the similiarities felt obvious and understandable. However, there are many other instances of books being translated to the so-called silver screen, and changes are very obvious in these as well, although depending on the screenwriter, sometimes needed.

A recent film, and great example of this is the recent Harry Potter films. These films were based on the famous series, and were adapted from screenplay through adding characters, removing certain events in the books, and adding events that would help to add suspense to the film. These are all things that are mirrored in the play version of As You Like It. Certain scenes in the play are omitted to help improve the flow and staging of the play, and some lines are rearranged to make more sense to the viewers. Along with this, scenery is changed to allow the audience a better look into the world, and to allow more immersion.

However, there is a side effect of having plays transferred into film. Not only does it impress the accents and images of the actors onto your next reading of the material, but also it affects how you interpret the source material. Going back and reading As You Like It has rendered the actors from the Globe production into my head, along with their accents, something that is highly irritating, especially when you are trying to act it out yourself.

Thursday 25 August 2011

Sarcasm in Shakespeare

In Shakespeare, as I said in the last blogpost, the majority of the humor seems to be sarcasm. Very lewd and witty, the sarcasm used in the majority of his comedic plays, and As You Like It especially. Three of the characters, Celia, Jaques and Touchstone, who play the comedic relief in the play are the characters that use the majority of sarcasm. They use it both attack other characters, and to make themselves seem more intelligent than the other characters. They also use it to advance the plot, and to build their relationships with other characters. By using sarcasm. the characters are able to show how they feel for the other characters, and are able to be rude without actually being rude, further making their characters improve and deepen.

Sarcasm is a motif that is seen it a large amount of Shakespear's plays, including his tragedies. While not as prevalent as lewdness, he uses sarcasm to show intelligent characters, and characters that arn't scared of what people think of them. This is another example of why Touchstone is very sarcastic. He's very intelligent, and doesn't want people to miss that, and so uses sarcasm to both upset them, and to lord his intelligence over them. This helps to show his character a little more, and also to make him feel like a more developed character. Celia uses sarcasm in a similar manner, where it is used to show that she is a strong woman, who doesn't depend on anybody, and uses wit and sarcasm to show how she feels about herself.

Tuesday 23 August 2011

How the Globe and Myself differ in opinion

In the Globe's production of As You Like It, the style of speech is a lot different to what I expected. The way that the actors speak is a lot more what I would expect from a soap opera or drama. It is very drawn out and classical sounding, which I didn't expect from a comedy. The ends of words are drawn out, which I understand is because of the size of the space. By drawing out what they are saying, the actors are able to project the voices over a large distance. Also, the actors are very interactive with the audience, something that makes the play feel a little more like what I would have expected from a contempory Shakespeare play.

Something else that I noticed that was different to the play was the way that the humor is portrayed. The humor is very in your face and not subtle at all, moving against what I expected, which was that the humor would be carried in the undertones. This is because of the sexual innuendo. However, in the Globe production, the humour takes on a slapstick style, becoming very overt. This is something that I didn't like about the Globe's production, as it removed some of the wit and power from some of the comedic speeches.

The characterisation of Orlando is something that I really liked. The actor playing him is very active and strong sounding, and plays the part exactly how I would have imagined him to be. He's very strong willed and insolent, exactly how the script makes him appear. The other characters are similarly portrayed how I expected them to be, with one exception. The character of Touchstone is very over the top and overt, which I did not expect at all. I expected for him to be very witty, and for his speech to be very sly and cunning. However, in the play, as I mentioned earlier, he is very over the top, which may actually speak to the intended audience for the initial play, which was the peasantry.

Monday 15 August 2011

My favourite aspect of Act 1

During Act 1, we are introduced to a variety of characters, all of which have very different personalities. They are a wide range of characters, with differing relationships and opinions. The favourite relationship that I have seen is the one between Orlando and Oliver.

This relationship is both intriguing and sad. Oliver, the eldest son of the family, was charged by his father to give Orlando an education. However, he hasn't done this, he has in fact refused. This is because he is scared that Orlando may try to take his power. This is a typically tragic story that is mirrored in a lot of story, including one of my personal favourite novels 'Solomon Cane' by Robert E. Howard. The whole story of a young son wanting to get what he is rightly owed by an older sibling is something that pulls very hardly at my heart, for reasons unknown to me. I find that it supplies a more interesting and believeable relationship between the characters, and is also something that the majority of people can relate to, as the majority of people have had sibling relationships.

Because this relationship is pervasive throughout the scene, and the driving force through Orlando and Oliver's motivations, I feel that this is my most favourite theme in the play.

Monday 8 August 2011

My favourite comedy sketch

This comedy sketch, from Michael Mcintryre's Comedy Roadshow, is a prime example of stand-up comedy. The combination of Mcintyre's apperance, accent and observations make it a thoroughly entertaining. However, what makes the exert especially funny is the way that the audience are able to make connections. Known as associative comedy, the audience furtheres the joke, without needing the comedian to make the joke himself. The example of this is in the end of the joke, when he mentions about the knife in his sock. The situation of the show is what allows this to happen. The show is set in Glasgow, where there is a large amount of knife crime. Again, because the audience is familiar with the situation, they are able to make the joke themselves, making it even funnier. Combined with the satire of the playful racism between England and Scotland and the accents affected by Mcintyre, this combines to make the comedy very pertinent to the audience, the group that comedians typically aim their material towards.

Sunday 22 May 2011

Blog Portfolio Quarter 4

The Tale of Kell Braxton

Recently, I've been playing in a role-playing game that a friend has been working on making. This is the story of the character that I played towards the end of that game.

He was born in a small village outside Kempen. Born to a poor father and mother. His brothers and sisters were younger than him, and Kell felt a responsibility to taking care of them. Growing up, he had noticed an aptitude for music in him, and one day, after his thirteenth birthday, after doing his chores, he approached a caravan that had arrived in the town and noticed a man selling some odds and ends. He noticed a flute, not a fancy one, but one made out of brass, with some dents in it. It seemed to call to him, and he spent what little money he had on it. He then began to pack his clothes, tell his parents that he was going on his travels in an attempt practice his art, and promised to send them some of the money he made each month. They tried to stop him, but he was too forceful, and told them that what little money they had would be better spent on his younger siblings.

He arrived in Kempen after a weeks travel. He had signed on with the caravan, offering to play what little music he knew for safe passage to the city. He slept roughly, as it was cold and damp at that time of year. The caravan guards mistreated him, as they felt they had to look after him, seeing as he was only a young boy.

Upon arrival in the city, Kell began to look for a place to stay. This was difficult, as he had very little money, and he eventually ended up sleeping on the street, for the night. In the morning, he found a place to busk for the day, and to his surprise, he made a fair amount of money, at least enough to pay for a room for the night.

He paid for the room, and left his meager pack there. He continued to busk, slowly, over 3 years, making enough money to pay for some clothing. It wasn't what a lord would wear, but they were good quality. This was the first purchase he'd made for himself since buying himself a weapon, so that he wouldn't be attacked in the street. His sword, and his clothing, along with his flute, were his only possessions. While Kempen had been good to him over the 3 years, and he'd made friends, he felt like he wanted to see the rest of the world.

He began to travel, leaving Kempen and heading towards the town of Zul, having heard of something of great importance going on there soon...

More coming soon!


Wanda Commentary

This poem is written in a very odd way. It breaks rules, it has odd diction, it uses dialect, and uses very powerful language. It is written as if talking to somebody else, but it is obviously referring to the poet herself, as the poet is also called Wanda. The poem is written using a funny diction. All of the sentences start with wanda, without the capitalization, showing either a lack of education from the speaker, or a lack of respect for the rules of grammar. The language is very aggressive, and self-deprecating. The fact that the speaker for the poem is speaking to herself seems to show some sort of illness, possibly schizophrenia.  This poem is a poem that breaks a lot of grammatical rules. There are hardly any sentences, with a grand total of 4 being throughout the poem. This again shows some sort of illness, where the speaker is very agitated, and confused. She uses little punctuation, again showing a rushed and agitated atmosphere.

The tone of the poem is very dark and chaotic. The speech patterns are fast, and the language is very aggressive. Lots of the language talks about pain and hurting, and almost shows pity for herself. This gives the impression of maybe a drug addict or somebody going through very powerful mental and physical trauma. There is also a dialect done, which shows possibly somebody being attacked through racism. The setting of the poem is in the persons mind. It is talking to her self-conscious, and shows what the poet thinks about her self, in her deepest thoughts.

The fact that the person may be agitated, and simply scribbling down her basest thoughts could be for two reasons. Either she is a drug-abuser, or she has a mental issue such as schizophrenia.

In my friend Danny's blog, he mentions how he believes that the reference to Wanda being ac/dc relates to the song 'Back in Black'. He mentions that this means that she has two settings, one of which that relates to her liking black men, or that its relation to the song is that she wants to regain her culture. I disagreed with him, and mentioned that I believe that it is a reference to a multi-personality disorder.

Thursday 19 May 2011

This is insane.

A good friend runs an amazing blog, and this most recent article that she posted really got to me. I think everybody should look at it.

http://cheapsignals.blogspot.com/

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Ms. Morgan!

Really hope you have a good one!

Monday 9 May 2011

Old Pond Poem Analysis

If this was my poetry final, I would first of all notice the extreme opposites in the poem. The poem's use of polar opposites is what gives the poem its contrast, and something that makes the imagery used stand out to me. Another major observation is the way that the poem seems to move from a macro scale, where it is examining the landscape, to the micro scale, where it examines the actions of a single bug. To me, that shows how everything is important, and how everything massive has an affect on something minute. The use of separate sentences, such as 'up through time' and 'Splash!' puts emphasis on these sentences, and makes the emotion and description that those sentences have carry more weight.

The fact that the poem's title seems to be detached from the body of the poem, lends importance to the title. It seems to say that the Old Pond is the centre of attention, or maybe even the speaker, and that the poem is about what the pond experiences or notices in its surroundings. 

I believe that the poem is speaking about what an effect a single object can have on its surroundings. The Old Pond seems to be something that has a hand in everything, it is what feeds the plants, what gives reflection to the mountains, and what gives the bug a habitat. The line, 'Up through time', tells how the tree's have experienced a lot of time, and that they change depending on how high up in the tree you go. The top of the tree is the youngest, and more likely to show the present, while the bottom of the tree is the oldest, and probably more likely to show what the past was like. 

Response to Paglia's Commentary:

In the commentary on "Old Pond", Paglia analysis a variety of different things, and discovers things that I missed when reading the poem through by myself. She specifically notices the theme of the poem, and goes to great lengths to explain what she believes it is. She says that the theme is about nature being powerful and man being at the mercy of nature. On this, I disagree with what she says, because throughout the poem there is hardly any mention of man, and the only thing that I believe shows any relation to man is the grandness of the mountains. This shows how tiny man is, in the grand scheme of things, but I do not see what she means by men being at the mercy of nature. She also mentions how the overall shape of the poem is shaped to show diving, and moving from a very high point to a very low point. She says that the shape shows cliffs, trees and eventually diving.

The commentary was very well formatted and easy to follow, as it was organised chronologically, starting from the beginning of the poem, with the author and the context of writing being analysed as well. This gives some background on the poem as well, and some reason in to what was being written. What makes the commentary even more useful is how she sticks to only her observations, and then moves on to her interpretations. This helps in two ways: Firstly, it tells you what she notices in the poem, and secondly it tells us her personal opinion, something that helps with our own interpretation of the poem.

Feral Mother

She watches, her eyes wide
Her cubs, she watches with pride.
A lion, spies them sitting
He approaches.

She panics,
as the lion approaches.
She knows,
her children's doom.

A moment of clarity,
she stands, and runs.
The lion sees her,
and runs after.

The cubs flee,
their mother runs.
The lion's glee,
turns to disgust.

As the mothers speed,
outruns the lions power.
The cubs and mother escape,
to live and prowl the landscape.

Sunday 8 May 2011

Commentary on Harlem Dancer

In the Harlem Dancer, the poet, Claude McKay, uses a Shakespearian Sonnet. This helps the poem in two different ways. First of all, it gives the poem a structure. A Shakespearian sonnet allows for a structure of 14 lines with 10 syllables in each. This gives the poem a structure to follow. This structure gives the poem a rhythm,  an integral part to this poem specifically. This poem is about dancing and singing, and the fact that the poem itself mirrors the rhythm of a dance lends to the theme. The iambic pentametre used by the poem gives the poem a rhyming structure, and lends itself to the theme of singing in the poem. The rhythmic cycle and rhyming structure is almost lyrical, and blends into the idea of a party very well.

A major theme that I interpreted in the poem is one of calm and strength. Throughout the piece, Claude McKay refers to her coldness, and her strength of stature. One line refers to her grace and calm. He mentions how to him she appears to be a proudly-swaying palm. This again gives us the image of strength. She is not distracted by the onlookers, and only seems to be performing from her heart, giving again an appearance of confidence and control.

Another motif that I dwell on while reading the poem is its use of metaphor. In the third and fourth line, metaphor is used to describe the womans voice. However, the metaphor used gives no room for misunderstanding. It describes a very singular sound, that of blended flutes being blown on a picnic day. I believe that this means a jazz-style melody, a very feminine one, as that is what I take from the metaphor.  This is a very exact feeling, something that the poet describes. This, along with the other metaphors used in the  poem help you to feel the exact feelings that the poet was feeling, and makes for a better and more profound experience while reading the poem

Wednesday 4 May 2011

To what extent does language define a culture?

In our school society, we all predominantly use English to communication. We do this for a variety of reasons, we grew up with the language, it is the language we're taught in, its the language our friends speak. Whatever the reason, we all use it. However, our language changes depending on who we speak to.

For example, lots of people in the world play online role-playing games, or MMORPG's, as they are colloquially known. This stands for Massively Multi-player Online Role-Playing Games. This is how they are known to people outside the group that plays the games. The style of speech that is used to express yourselves is very different to a linguist. This sentence: 'We need more dps on this boss. His enrage timer is going to tick soon. Tank, get the adds, and lock's pile on the dots. Heals are needed on group 1' means nothing to somebody that is outside of the MMO culture. It just sounds like odd words thrown into a fragmented sentence. However, to somebody that is well ingrained into that culture, the sentence means something very important. The same is true of a scientist. They could talk about variables, and molecule changes, reactions and data tables to another scientist, and they will understand this completely. A MMO player wouldn't understand at all.

However, there can be overlap. If somebody belonged to both cultures, they would be able to converse with both types of people. This can occur in many, many different cultures, with the way of speaking changing depending on who you are speaking to. I wouldn't speak to my English teacher the way that I talk to my guild in World of Warcraft, who I wouldn't talk to the same way as my girlfriend, who I wouldn't talk to the same was I speak to my parents.

An extension of this is macro-cultures: In the United Kingdom, we speak in a very different way to people in the United States. In the UK, there is a lot more irony in the speech, while in the US the style of humour in sentences is a lot more direct. This is reflected in all aspects of the culture, and is just shown predominantly in the speech. Advertisements are modified to reflect this, election campaigns and such. These change again in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Because we all speak slightly different dialects of English, we all have different things that appeal to us. The different amounts of people that speak these different dialects, and their different ways of thinking twists the language even more, so that each person has their own dialect, their own way of speaking. This special way of speaking is what makes people unique, and people being unique is what what makes cultures grow. 

Wednesday 16 March 2011

Self-Review In-class Writing:

1. Does my introduction include all the information necessary for the reader to move forward? Yes, it does.
2. Is the thesis statement clear and concise?
Yes
3. Does it answer the prompt directly? Yes
4. Do(es) my topic sentence(s) relate directly to my thesis
Yes, it relates directly to the thesis statement
5. Do I provide a clear illustration through textual evidence of my topic sentence?
Yes
6. Do I spend the bulk of the body paragraph(s) analyzing the literary elements used in my illustration?
I feel that I do not do this, as I spend an equal amount of time analysing and interpreting the evidence
7. Do I successfully argue how these examples relate to my thesis statement?
I believe that they successfully relate to my thesis statement, and that they get across the basic point of the passage
8. Where could I be more explicit in my interpretation or analysis?
I could be more explicit in taking more time to analyse the quotes, as I believe there is still more to be analysed in the piece
9. Is there anything the reader needs to know?
The reader needs to know about the basic family structure, and the relationship that Gregor has with Grete

Friday 4 March 2011

Blog Portfolio

This current quater on Existentialist literature has been my favourite by far. I've really enjoyed the debating on philosophy, and looking into the way that people from different cultures and backgrounds portray it.

Coverage:Blog 1: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/01/by-believeing-that-it-has-no-affect-on.html

Blog 2: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/01/gaming-harmful.html

Blog 3: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/01/hunger-parody.html

Blog 4: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/02/gregors-unhappiness.html

Blog 5: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/02/christian-perversions.html

Blog 6: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/02/hunger-artist.html

Blog 7: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/02/how-kafkaesque-is-kafka.html

Depth:
Blog 5: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/02/christian-perversions.html

Interaction:


Discussion:
Blog 7: http://iyagovos.blogspot.com/2011/02/how-kafkaesque-is-kafka.html

Xenoblogging:
http://rahdigga27.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/world-lit-writing-plan/

Wildcard:
Sadly, the wildcard that I had written, which was an edited and continued version of the last one, was lost when my computer crashed. I'm stil trying to recover it, and should be found soon.