Me and Komali wrote this post together, the original being on her blog.
- Scoop is not the antagonist; he is a foil to Heidi’s character. They
are similar in some regards, but very different in others. At Scoop’s
wedding, he tells Heidi:Scoop: “But I couldn’t dangle you anymore. And
that’s why I got married today. So.”
Heidi: “So. So now it’s all my fault.”
Scoop: “Sure it is. You want other things in life than I do.”
Heidi: “Really, like what?”
Scoop: “Self-fulfillment. Self determination. Self-exaggeration.”
Heidi: “That’s exactly what you want.”
Scoop: “Right. Then you’d be competing with me.”
They have similar interests, but Heidi does not want to compete with Scoop. - I think Wasserstein agrees with the concept of feminism, but does not agree with the hypocritical approach most women take in order to combat inequality of the sexes, which is by portraying men as evil or chauvinistic. Scoop is thoroughly an intellectual and often highlights Heidi’s ignorance and lack of awareness about herself or her surroundings. For example, in the scene where the two meet, Heidi is drawn to Scoop, but he is acting superior, so she chooses to play a game with him by lying about her name and why she is at the McCarthy convention. When Heidi says that she finds Scoop irritating, he says, “That’s the first honest thing you’ve said all night!” Even then, Heidi doesn’t realize what he means- he knows her name isn’t Susan because she is wearing a name tag that says “Heidi,” which Heidi has conveniently forgotten about.
- Scoop also says, “You are too eager to categorize.” This shows how others interpret feminists, who don’t consider the fact that people are multi-faceted. They believe all men are evil and chauvinistic, but in reality, they can have other sides to them- kinder personalities. Scoop’s way of speaking, from the beginning, shows his maturity, whereas feminists can come across as somewhat childlike. At Scoop’s wedding, he speaks about “life choices” and Heidi says, “I have not made them yet.” Like children, feminists at that time wanted to own everything, they felt that was the way to establish their strength. Wasserstein believes that is excessive and that they should grasp more “adult” ideas.
- I think the biggest message Scoop is used to convey is that men will settle, but feminist women always want more; they cannot be satisfied. They pass the limit and their argument for equality becomes invalid because they have already achieved it. Scoop is “willing to settle for a secure six” when he marries Lisa, but Heidi never marries because she refuses to accept anyone less than a perfect 10.
- What techniques does Wasserstein use to convey this message? Dialogue
James and Komali,
ReplyDeleteBased on our discussion in class today, I feel that this analysis is a more accurate representation of Scoop as it does not place him in a negative light that he may not deserve. For example, Scoop doesn't have an 'obligation' to appease Heidi simply because she wants to raise their relationship to another level.
I agree with you. I feel that the majority of the "hatred" towards Scoop, comes from the feeling that he is obliged to make Heidi happy. I find that this is an unfair sentiment. It sets one persons wants and needs over another, which is what Heidi is fighting against.
ReplyDelete